AIM: To assess feasibility of unsedated esophagoscopy using a small-caliber disposable transnasal esophagosco-py and to compare its accuracy with standard endoscopy.METHODS: We prospectively included subjects who were referred for upper endoscopy. All subjects un-derwent transnasal endoscopy with E.G. Scan<sup>TM</sup>. The disposable probe has a 3.6 mm gauge and at its distal end there is a 6 mm optical capsule, with a viewing angle of 125°. Patients underwent conventional endos-copy after the completion of E.G. Scan<sup>TM</sup>. We describe the findings detected by the E.G. Scan<sup>TM</sup> and calculate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Kappa index for esophageal diagnosis.RESULTS: A total of 96 patients(54 women), mean age of 50.12 years(14 to 79), were evaluated. In all cases we were able to perform esophagoscopy with E.G.Scan<sup>TM</sup>. The average realization time was 5 min. A total of 58 alterations were detected in the esophagus, 49 gastric abnormalities and 13 duodenal abnormalities. We found that for esophageal varices, E.G. Scan<sup>TM</sup> has sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 95%, 97% and 97%, respectively. Kappa coefficients were 0.32 for hiatal hernia, 0.409 for erosive gastroesopha-geal reflux disease, 0.617 for Barrett’s esophagus, and 0.909 for esophageal varices.CONCLUSION: Esophagoscopy with E.G. Scan? is a well-tolerated, fast and safe procedure. It has an ap-propriate diagnostic accuracy for esophageal varices when compared with conventional endoscopy.