作者:
基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Since chemotherapy started in 1940s, chemosensitivity testing has been both a very attractive field and one fraught with potential pitfalls. Many methods were developed and brought initial promises, yet later ending in disappointment and were eliminated. For example, in the 1970s clonogenic assay was generally believed to be the best testing method for predicting clinical outcome. However, technical problems including low evaluation rate limited its use. Currently, MTT, ATP, DISC and Kern’s assay hold better promises. Since the 90s, the study of molecular biology has been progressing rapidly. It accelerated the understanding of molecular mechanisms of drug response. Numerous papers were published, but only few techniques can be applied in clinical practice. This review summarizes the controversies and current progress of chemosensitivity assays based on available online information, and makes a suggestion about their future routine practice.
推荐文章
Diffusion in garnet: a review
High temperature and high pressure
Diffusion
Garnet
Point defects
A review of geoanalytical databases
Database
Geochemistry
Geology
Geoanalysis
Information system
Limestone mechanical deformation behavior and failure mechanisms: a review
Mechanical deformation
Brittle fracture
Ductility failure
Strength criterion
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Cancer Chemosensitivity Testing: Review
来源期刊 癌症治疗(英文) 学科 医学
关键词 CANCER CHEMOSENSITIVITY Testing CELL CULTURE MOLECULAR
年,卷(期) 2014,(7) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 672-679
页数 8页 分类号 R73
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2014(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
CANCER
CHEMOSENSITIVITY
Testing
CELL
CULTURE
MOLECULAR
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
癌症治疗(英文)
月刊
2151-1934
武汉市江夏区汤逊湖北路38号光谷总部空间
出版文献量(篇)
606
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导