基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
AIM: To verify the safety and validity of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients.METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed of a systematic search of studies on an electronic database. Studies that compared laparoscopic colectomy(LAC) in elderly colorectal cancer patients with open colectomy(OC) were retrieved, and their short and long-term outcomes compared. Elderly people were defined as 65 years old or more. Inclusion criteria were set at: Resection of colorectal cancer, comparison between laparoscopic and OC and no significant difference in backgrounds between groups.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified for analysis. LAC was performed on 1436 patients, and OC performed on 1810 patients. In analyses of short-term outcomes, operation time for LAC was longer than for OC(mean difference = 34.4162, 95%CI: 17.8473-50.9851, P < 0.0001). The following clinical parameters were lower in LAC than in OC: Amount of estimated blood loss(mean difference =-93.3738, 95%CI:-132.3437 to-54.4039, P < 0.0001), overall morbidity(OR = 0.5427, 95%CI: 0.4425-0.6655, P < 0.0001), incisional surgical site infection(OR = 0.6262, 95%CI: 0.4310-0.9097, P = 0.0140), bowel obstruction and ileus(OR = 0.6248, 95%CI: 0.4519-0.8638, P = 0.0044) and cardiovascular complications(OR = 0.4767, 95%CI: 0.2805-0.8101, P = 0.0062). In analyses of long-term outcomes(median follow-up period: 36.4 mo in LAC, 34.3 mo in OC), there was no significant difference in overall survival(mean difference = 0.8321, 95%CI: 0.5331-1.2990, P = 0.4187) and disease specific survival(mean difference = 1.0254, 95%CI: 0.6707-1.5675, P = 0.9209). There was also no significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes(mean difference =-0.1360, 95%CI:-4.0553-3.7833, P = 0.9458).CONCLUSION: LAC in elderly colorectal cancer patients had benefits in short-term outcomes compared with OC except operation time. The long-term outcomes and oncological clearance of LAC were similar to that of OC. These results support the assertion that
推荐文章
Diffusion in garnet: a review
High temperature and high pressure
Diffusion
Garnet
Point defects
基于Windows NT的Open GL三维程序设计
Open GL
渲染环境(RC)
封装
设备描述表(DC)
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients
来源期刊 世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志:英文版(电子版) 学科 医学
关键词 LAPAROSCOPIC surgery Systematic review META-ANALYSIS COLORECTAL cancer ELDERLY PATIENT
年,卷(期) 2016,(7) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 573-582
页数 10页 分类号 R735.34
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2016(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
LAPAROSCOPIC
surgery
Systematic
review
META-ANALYSIS
COLORECTAL
cancer
ELDERLY
PATIENT
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志:英文版(电子版)
月刊
1948-5204
北京市朝阳区东四环中路62号楼远洋国际中
出版文献量(篇)
664
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
  • 期刊分类
  • 期刊(年)
  • 期刊(期)
  • 期刊推荐
论文1v1指导