基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Academic paper is an important expression form of scientific and technological researches,particularly the basic research achievements of natural science,while the research of its academic influence has always been concerned by scientific and technological circles.One important aspect of the research of academic influence is the relationship between subsequent academic papers and previously published papers,which has a great influence on academic innovation.At present,the academic influence of Chinese scientists was determine mainly based on the number of articles,journal it published in,and quote rate.While the problems the paper solved is relatively not so important.To accurately estimate the value of an achievement or an academic paper,we should firstly make clear whether its topic targets to important questions of its field,then to make clear whether its results do solve problems of its field.The original achievements are the source of academic influence.The present concept called "influence factor",which only takes citation relationship and citation times between academic papers into consideration,is in fact the surface reflection (or to say,incomplete reflection) of the academic influence of papers.Accurately evaluating the academic influence of an academic paper plays a significant role in stimulating the innovation potential of researchers,creating scientific innovation environment,and building and developing national innovation system.The evaluation activities in scientific research area depend on the sound and normative evaluation environment.And moreover,they depend on the evaluation methods adaptive to the characteristics of scientific research.The status quo and the issue about the research evaluation methods are reviewed and analyzed in this paper.Based on these analyses,this paper advanced the conceptions of academic inheritance.The academic and practical value of the academic inheritance relationship research on the evaluation of scientific research are analyzed.The inheritance and dissemination of academic achievements is the original intention and essence of academic papers.Based on the current situation that academic paper evaluation depends on the impact factor excessively,so this paper advocates the research of academic inheritance effect.There are a large number of "chain" pattern inheritance phenomenons of knowledge innovation and discipline development in the field of scientific research,that is,the academic inheritance and academic chain.The present paper illustrates the concept,features and existing form of academic inheritance effect and academic chain in detail with several specific examples.The present research deeply contributes to reflecting the academic value of scientific papers and accurately grasping the frontier of subject development.It also has essential theoretical in academic influence evaluation and academic innovation.Two new evaluation indices,the first index F1 and the second index F2,were introduced in consideration of current situation and deficiency of "SCI evaluation system".New evaluation indices based on long-term citation and academic inheritance.Reference period reflects the academic inheritance which can not be separated from long-term reference.These two relatively complemented evaluation indices can accurately reflect the academic influence and academic value of scientific research results.In summary,the research on academic inheritance and the two new evaluation indices can not only enhance the value of peer-review,but also avoid the defect of SCI evaluation which cited as the only consideration.On the other hand,the update and improvement of the scientific research evaluation system is realized,which is beneficial to the diversified development of the evaluation index.
推荐文章
卓越导向的学术论文影响力评价框架构建
卓越导向
学术论文评价
影响力
百分位指标
医学领域学者学术论文影响力评价方法
学术影响力
评价
医学领域学者
医学领域学者学术影响力计算模型
学术论文中基金项目标注评价新指标的探索
基金项目
不当标注
评价指标
我国护理期刊学术影响力评价指标的研究
护理期刊
学术影响力
期刊评价
评价指标体系
权重
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 用学术影响力评价学术论文——兼论关于学术传承效应和长期引用的两个新指标
来源期刊 科学通报 学科
关键词
年,卷(期) 2016,(26) 所属期刊栏目 观点
研究方向 页码范围 2853-2860
页数 8页 分类号
字数 语种 中文
DOI 10.1360/N972016-00925
五维指标
作者信息
序号 姓名 单位 发文数 被引次数 H指数 G指数
1 冯长根 342 5285 35.0 51.0
2 孙良 14 41 4.0 5.0
3 尚海茹 8 55 4.0 7.0
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (109)
共引文献  (105)
参考文献  (19)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
1943(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1949(2)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1976(2)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1977(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1979(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1981(2)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(2)
1986(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1992(2)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1993(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1994(4)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(4)
1995(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1997(3)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(2)
1998(10)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(10)
1999(2)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(2)
2000(3)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2001(11)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(10)
2002(8)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(8)
2003(9)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(8)
2004(6)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(5)
2005(9)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(7)
2006(6)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(5)
2007(6)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(5)
2008(4)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2009(6)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(6)
2011(13)
  • 参考文献(4)
  • 二级参考文献(9)
2012(6)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(6)
2013(3)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2014(3)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2015(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2016(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2016(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
科学通报
旬刊
0023-074X
11-1784/N
大16开
北京东城区东黄城根北街16号
80-213
1950
chi
出版文献量(篇)
11887
总下载数(次)
74
  • 期刊分类
  • 期刊(年)
  • 期刊(期)
  • 期刊推荐
论文1v1指导