基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Objective: Transradial coronary catheterization has proved to be safe and effective in clinical practice. Various hemostatic compressive devices have been used in subsequent procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a new hemostatic compression device and the widely used TR Band. Methods: A total of 118 patients were divided randomly into two groups: TR Band and the new hemostatic compression device. Efficacy of hemostasis, patient comfort, local vascular dysfunction, and radial artery occlusion(RAO) were evaluated and compared between groups. Results: Occurrence of errhysis or hematoma did not significantly differ between groups(13.6% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.782). Fewer patients had moderate to severe pain or moderate to severe numbness in the new hemostatic compression device group(1.7% vs. 22.0%;1.7% vs. 18.6%, respectively). Pulse loss between distal artery and device was lower in the new hemostatic compression device group(5.1% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.007), and fewer patients experienced obstruction of venous reflux compared with the TR Band group(6.8% vs. 25.4%, P = 0.006). Combined incidence of RAO at discharge was 7.6%, and was lower in the new hemostatic compression device group(1.7% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.015). In contrast to the TR Band, application of the new hemostatic compression device was independently associated with lower incidence of RAO at discharge(odds ratio: 0.062, 95% confidence interval: 0.006–0.675, P = 0.022). Conclusions: Both the new hemostatic compression device and the TR Band can efficiently achieve hemostasis following transradial coronary catheterization. However, fewer patients felt discomfort with application of the new hemostatic compression device. Pulse loss in the artery distal to the compression device, obstruction of venous reflux, and RAO occurred significantly less often with application of the new device.
推荐文章
桡动脉径路PCI后应用TR Band止血气囊压迫止血的时间探讨
TRBand止血气囊
桡动脉
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
止血技术
并发症
TR Band止血阀在经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后止血的护理观察
桡动脉穿刺
TR Band止血阀
冠状动脉介入术
血管并发症
护理
Incorporation of silica into the goethite structure: a microscopic and spectroscopic study
Quartz
Goethite
Twinned goethite
Microscopic characterization (FESEM and TEM)
FT-IR spectroscopy
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 A comparative study of TR Band and a new hemostatic compression device after transradial coronary catheterization
来源期刊 介入医学杂志 学科 医学
关键词 TRANSRADIAL CORONARY CATHETERIZATION hemostatic compression DEVICE RADIAL artery OCCLUSION
年,卷(期) 2018,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 221-228
页数 8页 分类号 R541.4
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2018(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
TRANSRADIAL
CORONARY
CATHETERIZATION
hemostatic
compression
DEVICE
RADIAL
artery
OCCLUSION
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
介入医学杂志
季刊
2096-3602
31-2138/R
上海市
出版文献量(篇)
83
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导