基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate whether the combination of Uremic clearance granule with Alprostadil is superior to Alprostadil alone for CRF. Methods: Relevant RCTs were searched through March 2019. Data were analyzed by Stata 15.0. Results: Nine articles involving 726 patients were enrolled in this study. Meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate [OR = 3.68 (2.44, 5.55), P < 0.001], Scr [SMD =-2.34 (-3.49,-1.19), P < 0.001], BUN [SMD =-1.80 (-2.73,-0.87), P < 0.001], Ccr [SMD = 0.71 (0.44, 0.97), P < 0.001] were better in the experimental group. But there were no significant difference in UA, CysC, 24h-Upro and incidence of adverse reactions (all P > 0.05) between two groups. No serious adverse reactions were found. Conclusions: The effect of the integrated medicine on CRF was better than Alprostadil alone. Uremic clearance granule is safe and has no obvious adverse reactions.
推荐文章
Limestone mechanical deformation behavior and failure mechanisms: a review
Mechanical deformation
Brittle fracture
Ductility failure
Strength criterion
Diffusion in garnet: a review
High temperature and high pressure
Diffusion
Garnet
Point defects
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Uremic clearance granule combined with Alprostadil in the treatment of chronic renal failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
来源期刊 TMR理论与假说 学科 医学
关键词 UREMIC CLEARANCE GRANULE Chronic RENAL Failure ALPROSTADIL META-ANALYSIS
年,卷(期) 2019,(3) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 195-203
页数 9页 分类号 R
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2019(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
UREMIC
CLEARANCE
GRANULE
Chronic
RENAL
Failure
ALPROSTADIL
META-ANALYSIS
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
TMR理论与假说
季刊
2538-130X
天津市河东区大直沽中路伯苓大厦B座906
出版文献量(篇)
61
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导