基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
The present paper deals with development of a course evaluation survey (CES) questionnaire regarding evaluation of humanities courses (e.g., Commerce/Economics/Law) and assessment of its validity and reliability. Taking help from available questionnaires and also incorporating views from the teachers of the related subjects, the relevant Likert type items were selected. The drafted version of the questionnaire was finalized taking into account feedback from the subject experts. The focus was on simple language to ensure clarity to the students to facilitate accuracy of the collected data. The developed questionnaire consists of five domains involving fifteen Likert type items including a global item. For assessment of its reliability and validity, data were collected among two groups of undergraduate students studying two courses namely Accounts (n = 190) and Law (n = 90). For assessing questionnaire, Karl Pearson Correlation Coefficient, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient and four factor solutions under factor analysis were used. The analytical results were quite consistent across the data sets (that are, accounts, law and pooled together) that exhibit good psychometric properties. It may thus be concluded that the questionnaire is valid, reliable and may measure what it is intended to measure.
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Scale for Evaluation of Humanities Courses: Development, Reliability and Validity
来源期刊 数据分析和信息处理(英文) 学科 文学
关键词 Course Evaluation Survey RELIABILITY Validity Factor Analysis
年,卷(期) 2020,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 358-377
页数 20页 分类号 H31
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2020(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
Course
Evaluation
Survey
RELIABILITY
Validity
Factor
Analysis
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
数据分析和信息处理(英文)
季刊
2327-7211
武汉市江夏区汤逊湖北路38号光谷总部空间
出版文献量(篇)
106
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导