作者:
基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
The theoretical base of the advocacy for green courts as a forum of social transformation by doing environmental and climate justice can be found from the arguments proposed by the supporters of specialized courts debate.Specialized forums,it is contended,are able to evolve superior procedural norms and develop better quality of jurisprudence through expert judges who have greater exposure to a homogeneous legal policy regime.They bring uniformity,consistency,and predictability in decision-making which enhances public confidence and helps in development of a rich body of environmental justice jurisprudence.Incidental benefits include time and cost savings as the requirement of massive documentation for understanding technical points of law in the special field is averted and streamlined procedures make litigation easier and quicker.Though there are pitfalls,like tunnel vision and capture by interest groups,yet,in view of the practical necessity,specialization appears to be an inevitable phenomenon and the field of environmental law has produced two excellent examples of successful forums in Australia and New Zealand.Environmental courts and tribunals(ECT)are being rapidly growing throughout the world and are becoming important phenomena of 21st century environmental law.As of January,2016,the numbers of specialist courts(ECT)have grown to 1,200 in 44 countries.The amazing growth of ECT worldwide is quite interesting as there are no international treaties or convention specifically requiring the states to create special environmental courts.Principle 10 of the Rio-Declaration is often quoted as the basis of creation of environmental courts,which in fact talks about“effective access to justice and administrative proceeding”and nowhere puts obligations to the members to constitute environmental courts.Australia and New Zealand had already taken a lead in creating environmental courts in their jurisdiction respectively but establishment of environmental court called as green tribunal has lacked far behind due to
推荐文章
Hydrogeochemical processes and multivariate analysis for groundwater quality in the arid Maadher reg
Groundwater quality
Hydrogeochemical processes
Multivariate analysis
Salinity
Mio-Plio
Quaternary aquifer
Role of hydro-geochemical functions on karst critical zone hydrology for sustainability of water res
Hydro-geochemical analysis
Karst critical zone
Water resources
Vegetation Southwest China
Spatial analysis of carbon storage density of mid-subtropical forests using geostatistics: a case st
Carbon storage density
Geostatistics
Mid-subtropical forests
Spatial autocorrelation
Spatial heterogeneity
The influence of climate and topography on chemical weathering of granitic regoliths in the monsoon
Granitic regolith
Chemical weathering
Supply-limited weathering
Kinetic-limited weathering
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Establishment of Green Courts in India and Their Role in Discharging Climate Justice—A Jurisprudential Analysis
来源期刊 美中法律评论:英文版 学科 数学
关键词 environmental courts climate justice environmental degradation human rights rule of law
年,卷(期) mzflplywb_2020,(7) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 300-316
页数 17页 分类号 O17
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2020(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
environmental
courts
climate
justice
environmental
degradation
human
rights
rule
of
law
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
美中法律评论:英文版
月刊
1548-6605
武汉洪山区卓刀泉北路金桥花园C座4楼
出版文献量(篇)
1057
总下载数(次)
4
论文1v1指导