基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Landslide is considered as one of the most severe threats to human life and property in the hilly areas of the world. The number of landslides and the level of damage across the globe has been increasing over time. Therefore, landslide management is essential to maintain the natural and socio-economic dynamics of the hilly region. Rorachu river basin is one of the most landslide-prone areas of the Sikkim selected for the present study. The prime goal of the study is to prepare landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) using computer-based advanced machine learning techniques and compare the performance of the models. To properly understand the existing spatial relation with the landslide, twenty factors, including trigger-ing and causative factors, were selected. A deep learning algorithm viz. convolutional neural network model (CNN) and three popular machine learning techniques, i.e., random forest model (RF), artificial neural network model (ANN), and bagging model, were employed to prepare the LSMs. Two separate datasets including training and validation were designed by randomly taken landslide and non-landslide points. A ratio of 70:30 was considered for the selection of both training and validation points. Multicollinearity was assessed by tolerance and variance inflation factor, and the role of individual con-ditioning factors was estimated using information gain ratio. The result reveals that there is no severe multicollinearity among the landslide conditioning factors, and the triggering factor rainfall appeared as the leading cause of the landslide. Based on the final prediction values of each model, LSM was con-structed and successfully portioned into five distinct classes, like very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility. The susceptibility class-wise distribution of landslides shows that more than 90%of the landslide area falls under higher landslide susceptibility grades. The precision of models was exam-ined using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and sta-tistical methods like root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). In both datasets (training and validation), the CNN model achieved the maximum AUC value of 0.903 and 0.939, respec-tively. The lowest value of RMSE and MAE also reveals the better performance of the CNN model. So, it can be concluded that all the models have performed well, but the CNN model has outperformed the other models in terms of precision.
推荐文章
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based statistical and machine learning mode
Landslide susceptibility mapping
Statistical model
Machine learning model
Four cases
Geochemistry and sediment in the main stream of the Ca River basin, Vietnam: weathering process, sol
Ca River
Dissolved solids
Geochemistry
Carbonate weathering
Suspended solids
基于情感计算的E-Learning模型框架
情感计算
E-Learning
和谐人机环境
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Applying deep learning and benchmark machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility modelling in Rorachu river basin of Sikkim Himalaya, India
来源期刊 地学前缘(英文版) 学科
关键词
年,卷(期) 2021,(5) 所属期刊栏目 Research Paper
研究方向 页码范围 264-280
页数 17页 分类号
字数 语种 英文
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (33)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (57)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
1979(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1986(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1990(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1991(3)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1996(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1998(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
1999(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2000(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2002(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2004(2)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
2006(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
2008(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2009(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2010(1)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
2011(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2012(5)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2013(2)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(1)
2014(4)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(2)
2015(6)
  • 参考文献(3)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2016(8)
  • 参考文献(6)
  • 二级参考文献(2)
2017(8)
  • 参考文献(4)
  • 二级参考文献(4)
2018(10)
  • 参考文献(7)
  • 二级参考文献(3)
2019(21)
  • 参考文献(11)
  • 二级参考文献(10)
2020(7)
  • 参考文献(7)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2021(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2021(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
地学前缘(英文版)
双月刊
1674-9871
11-5920/P
16开
北京市海淀区学院路29号中国地质大学(北京)《地学前缘》英文刊编辑部
2010
eng
出版文献量(篇)
1146
总下载数(次)
0
论文1v1指导