基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
There were obvious differences between a medium gravel-less perforated pipe leach fields and a small system in the treatment of demestic sewage with the change of influent quality. In small system, COD removal rate was 91%, ammonia nitrogen removal rate was 90%, total nitrogen was 58%. In medium system, COD removal rate was 86.07%, ammonia nitrogen removal rate was 45.3%, and total nitrogen was 48.2%. This paper studied on the differences. Its main reasons were as follows: differences in opening rate (perforated area account of the total area in infiltration pipe), air flow conditions, exterior environment, and wastewater distribution. Considering those problems, Solutions and applications for the development of GPPLF are given.
推荐文章
一种基于XML的One to One营销优化建模方法
One to One营销优化模型
XML
DOM
自定义建模
一类One to One营销优化模型及其解决方案
One to One营销优化
优化模型
线性规划算法
MATLAB
一类One to One安排优化问题及其进化算法
遗传算法
安排问题
组合优化
局部搜索
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Comparing a small gravel-less perforated pipe leach fields (GPPLF) to a medium one in treating domestic sewage
来源期刊 自然科学期刊(英文) 学科 医学
关键词 Gravel-Less Perforated PIPE LEACH FIELDS Pollutants Removal Rate Comparing Component Formatting Style STYLING Insert
年,卷(期) 2012,(3) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 192-197
页数 6页 分类号 R73
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2012(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
Gravel-Less
Perforated
PIPE
LEACH
FIELDS
Pollutants
Removal
Rate
Comparing
Component
Formatting
Style
STYLING
Insert
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
自然科学期刊(英文)
月刊
2150-4091
武汉市江夏区汤逊湖北路38号光谷总部空间
出版文献量(篇)
1054
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导