基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Most patients treated with curative intent for colorectal cancer(CRC) are included in a follow-up program involving periodic evaluations. The survival benefits of a follow-up program are well delineated, and previous meta-analyses have suggested an overall survival improvement of 5%-10% by intensive follow-up. However, in a recent randomized trial, there was no survival benefit when a minimal vs an intensive follow-up program was compared. Less is known about the potential side effects of follow-up. Well-known side effects of preventive programs are those of somatic complications caused by testing, negative psychological conse-quences of follow-up itself, and the downstream impact of false positive or false negative tests. Accordingly, the potential survival benefits of CRC follow-up must be weighed against these potential negatives. The present review compares the benefits and side effects of CRC follow-up, and we propose future areas for research.
推荐文章
Diffusion in garnet: a review
High temperature and high pressure
Diffusion
Garnet
Point defects
Effects of river damming on biogenic silica turnover: implications for biogeochemical carbon and nut
River damming
Biogenic silica
Biogeochemical cycles
River ecosystem
ITER Side 校正场线圈端部大圆弧模压成形及回弹分析
ITER Side校正场线圈
模压成形
回弹
有限元分析
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review
来源期刊 世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志:英文版(电子版) 学科 医学
关键词 Colorectal 癌症 后续 监视 假积极 癌症生存
年,卷(期) 2014,(5) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 104-111
页数 8页 分类号 R
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2014(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
Colorectal
癌症
后续
监视
假积极
癌症生存
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志:英文版(电子版)
月刊
1948-5204
北京市朝阳区东四环中路62号楼远洋国际中
出版文献量(篇)
664
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
  • 期刊分类
  • 期刊(年)
  • 期刊(期)
  • 期刊推荐
论文1v1指导