作者:
基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
A much debated issue in linguistics involves the extent to which the forms of languages(phonemes,morphemes,words,phrases and syntactic structures)have been shaped by the functions that languages perform.This paper begins by defining what these'functions'are:the forms of language must express(i.e.be capable of being paired with)an infinite set of meanings in a consistent way;these form-meaning pairings must be readily processable by language producers and comprehenders in real time;and they must be readily learnable.This paper then focuses on the processability function,and enumerates some problems that complicate discussions of whether processing has actually played a role in shaping grammars,especially in morphology and syntax.Most of these problems,it is argued,are the result of unresolved issues in current theories regarding e.g.the precise relationship between production and comprehension,the measurement of working memory load,and the relationship between prediction and the integration of preceding and following items in on-line processing.I argue here that the linguistic question of explaining why the world’s grammars are the way they are,and understanding the role of processing in explaining grammatical forms,need not,and cannot,wait for these big general issues to be resolved in psycholinguistics.Instead,we can adopt a more empirical approach that compares patterns in grammatical forms and structures across languages with relevant empirical patterns in usage data within languages,from corpora and experiments.This more empirical approach allows us to test whether there is,or is not,a match between grammatical data on the one hand,and usage data on the other,that are the products of the processing mechanisms that psycholinguistic theories are trying to def ine.These patterns can be described in theory-general or-neutral ways and they can shed light on whether grammatical forms have been shaped by performance,without us having to f ill in all the details of the contributing processing theories.This paper il
推荐文章
基于认知视角研究英语‘Way’构式语义生成机制
英语‘Way’构式
构式语法
转喻压制
关于Forward的几个开发应用技巧
Forward
开发工具包
动态库
应用技巧
Two-way中继系统中的双向中继选择及功率分配策略
two-way中继
AF
中继选择
功率分配
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Problems in the Language Form and Function Debate and a Way Forward
来源期刊 语言与符号学研究 学科 文学
关键词
年,卷(期) 2015,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 19-33
页数 15页 分类号 H04
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2015(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
语言与符号学研究
季刊
2096-031X
32-1859/H
The School of Foreig
28-471
出版文献量(篇)
206
总下载数(次)
1
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导