Peripheral nerve imaging: Not only cross-sectional area

• 作者: Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
• 来源期刊: 世界放射学杂志：英文版（电子版）
• 学科: 医学
• 关键词: ULTRASOUND IMAGING Magnetic RESONANCE IMAGING NERVE density Fascicular ratio
• 年，卷（期）: 2016,（8）
• 页码范围: 726-728
• 页数: 3页
• 分类号: R745

摘要

Peripheral nerve imaging is recognized as a complement to clinical and neurophysiological assessment in the evaluation of peripheral nerves with the ability to impact patient management, even for small and difficult nerves. The European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology,suggest to use ultrasound(US) for nerve evaluation due to the fact that, in sever anatomical area, magnetic resonance imaging is not able to give additional in-formations. US could be considered the first-choice approach for the assessment of peripheral nerves. The relative drawback of peripheral nerve US is the long learning curve and the deep anatomic competence to evaluate even small nerves. In the recent years, the role of US in peripheral nerve evaluation has been widened. In the past, nerve US was mainly used to assess nerve-cross sectional area, but now more advanced mea-surements and considerations are desirable and can boost the role of peripheral nerve US. Nerve echotexture evaluation was defined in 2010: The ratio between the hypoechoic and hyperechoic areas of peripheral nerves on US was called 'nerve density'. For evaluation of patients who have peripheral neuropathies, the role of peripheral nerve is US wider than simple cross-sectional area evaluation. Quantitative measurements describing the internal fascicular echotexture of peripheral nerves introduce the concept of considering US as a possible quantitative imaging biomarker technique. The potential of nerve US has started to be uncovered. It seems clear that only cross-sectional area measurement is no more sufficient for a comprehensive US evaluation of peripheral nerves.