基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Aim: To evaluate the benefits and hazards of routine progesterone supplementation in threatened abortion and whether it is a sound practice or not. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Tanta University in the period from January 2018 to December 2018. Eligible patients (n = 190) were randomly allocated into 2 groups: study group who will receive progesterone supplementation (prog. group) and control group who will receive no treatment (place. group). Results: No significant differences were found between both groups regarding all demographic data and pregnancy characteristics. Abortions were higher in place. group 17 (23.94%) than in prog. group 12 (16.44%) with no significant difference p value = 0.263. The incidence of preterm labour was also higher in the place. group 22 (30.99%) in comparison to the prog. group 17 (23.29%) with no significant difference p value = 0.300. Conclusion: Progesterone supplementation in threatened abortion was not beneficial although it reduced abortion and preterm labour rates.
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Routine Progesterone Supplementation in Threatened Abortion: Is It a Sound Practice?
来源期刊 妇产科期刊(英文) 学科 医学
关键词 PROGESTERONE THREATENED ABORTION Supplementation SOUND PRACTICE
年,卷(期) 2019,(12) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 1541-1548
页数 8页 分类号 R16
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2019(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
PROGESTERONE
THREATENED
ABORTION
Supplementation
SOUND
PRACTICE
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
妇产科期刊(英文)
月刊
2160-8792
武汉市江夏区汤逊湖北路38号光谷总部空间
出版文献量(篇)
642
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导