作者:
基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Though The Analects is considered one of the major classics of both Confucianism and Chinese culture,little work has been done in investigating the discursive and rhetorical elements of the text and the ways in which it seeks to create a positive perception of Confucius and Confucianism.Based on the Appraisal Theory developed in systemic-functional linguistics for studying interpersonal meaning,this paper focuses on the role of the kinds of attitude constructed and features of attitudinal resources used to determine how Confucius and Confucianism are projected into the text.Drawing on a detailed analysis of 10 texts,the paper explores the ways in which attitudinal resources work as elicitors of identification in The Analects.The study shows that all of the selected texts are rich in attitudinal resources,although the three attitude values,i.e.affect,judgment,and appreciation,are not equally distributed.The resources of judgment in the texts make up 57%of the total,while the frequencies of occurrence for affect and appreciation make up the remainder almost equivalently.The qualitative analysis of the corpus demonstrates how features of attitudes are used to create a positive image of Confucianism and thus achieve reader identif ication.The study provides a strong argument for the need to examine varieties of attitudes as components of rhetoric and suggests that those interested in the study of The Analects need to become more aware of how aspects of attitude and appraisal were used to accomplish rhetorical goals.
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Attitudinal Resources and Elicitors of Identii cation in The Analects
来源期刊 语言与符号学研究 学科 文学
关键词
年,卷(期) 2015,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 146-159
页数 14页 分类号 H15
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2015(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
语言与符号学研究
季刊
2096-031X
32-1859/H
The School of Foreig
28-471
出版文献量(篇)
206
总下载数(次)
1
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导