作者:
基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
This study conducted a review of the literature on Twitter and politics. The review is summarized under three inter-related themes: 1) does social media help politicians to be elected? 2) who benefits from social media? and 3) political polarization on Twitter. Regarding the first theme, some studies find a strong support for the argument that politicians may create electoral benefits from adopting this new technology, while others fail to find such evidence. Evidence regarding the second query is also mixed. Many have believed that underdogs may benefit the most from social media uses, but several studies challenge this claim by showing that the already established and popular politicians may be those who gain most from their Twitter uses. Taken altogether, previous evidence regarding the first and second queries is mixed. However, previous studies still find strong evidence of increasingly polarizing public opinions on Twitter and of social media’s contribution to this trend.
推荐文章
Diffusion in garnet: a review
High temperature and high pressure
Diffusion
Garnet
Point defects
Limestone mechanical deformation behavior and failure mechanisms: a review
Mechanical deformation
Brittle fracture
Ductility failure
Strength criterion
256排Revolution CT在冠心病诊断中的应用价值
256排RevolutionCT
冠状动脉造影
冠心病
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Politics and the Twitter Revolution: A Brief Literature Review and Implications for Future Research
来源期刊 社交网络(英文) 学科 医学
关键词 TWITTER SOCIAL Media POLITICS
年,卷(期) 2018,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 243-251
页数 9页 分类号 R73
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2018(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
TWITTER
SOCIAL
Media
POLITICS
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
社交网络(英文)
季刊
2169-3285
武汉市江夏区汤逊湖北路38号光谷总部空间
出版文献量(篇)
112
总下载数(次)
0
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导