Evaluation of BDS and GPS RAIM availability based on data collected in June 2020

• 作者: Xiaping Ma Kegen Yu Ershen Wang Xiaoxing He Tieding Lu Qinzhen Li
• 来源期刊: 大地测量与地球动力学（英文版）
• 年，卷（期）: 2021,（3）
• 页码范围: 181-189
• 页数: 9页
• 语种: 英文

摘要

The satellite pseudo-range fault detection with the Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) method is affected by several satellite observations and the geometric distribution of satellites. The poor geometry distribution of satellites will conceal the positioning error caused by the satellite pseudo-range fault, resulting in unreliable detection results. Therefore, the availability evaluation must be made before RAIM to ensure that the fault detection performance will not be affected. On June 23, 2020, China successfully launched the 30th (last) navigation satellite of BeiDou's third-generation navigation satellite system (BDS-3), which is also the 55th BeiDou navigation satellite. Combining all the available satellites of BDS-1, BDS-2 and BDS-3, the positioning performance of BDS can be greatly improved. In order to evaluate the RAIM availability of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) in China, this paper first deduces the mathematical models and their characteristics of the three RAIM availability evaluation methods. Then, the study area (N10°-70° , E60°-150° ) is divided into 4536 grid points at intervals of 1 ° × 1 ° in latitude and longitude, and the elevations of these grid points are taken from the global terrain data file. The Horizontal Protection Level (HPL) values of these grid points are calculated during 8-15 June 2020 using BDS and GPS ephemeris data. The RAIM availability differences between the two systems are compared and analysed. The analysis shows the Horizontal Protection Level method (HPLM) based on single-satellite pseudo-range fault is the most practical and convenient. During the 8-day observation period, the HPL values of BDS are significantly smaller than those of GPS in terms of geographic location and observation time, and the variation of HPL time series of BDS is also smaller than that of GPS, which indicates that the RAIM availability of GPS in China is not as good as that of BDS. Most importantly, in the four flight stages of the aircraft's Oceanic/Continental low-density En-route, Continental En-route, Terminal En-route and Non-precision approach (NPA), BDS can completely satisfy its RAIM availability requirement, while GPS can only meet the availability requirement of the En-route (Oceanic/Continental low density) phase, and the availability of the other three phases can at least reach 99.714％.