Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy

• 作者: Byyup Karahan Ibrahim Tuncer Mehmet Qzgur Zengin
• 来源期刊: 国际眼科杂志：英文版
• 学科: 医学
• 关键词: AUTOREFRACTOR 手持的折射媒体 视网膜镜检法 Retinomax
• 年，卷（期）: 2014,（3）
• 页码范围: 491-495
• 页数: 5页
• 分类号: R77

摘要

AIM:To compare noncycloplegic and cycloplegic results of Retinomax measurements with findings achieved after cycloplegia using table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy.METHODS:The study included 127 patients(mean age96.7mo,range 21 to 221).Retinomax(Rmax)(Nikon Inc.,Japan)was used to obtain noncycloplegic refraction.Under cycloplegia,refraction was measured with Rmax,table-top autorefractor(TTR)(Nikon NRK 8000,Inc.,Japan)and retinoscopy.The values of sphere,spherical equivalent,cylinder and axis of cylinder were recorded for Rmax,TTR and retinoscopy in each eye.All results were analyzed statistically.RESULTS:The mean spheric values(SV),spherical equivalent values(SEV)and cylindrical values(CV)of the noncycloplegic Rmax(SV:0.64 D,SEV:0.65 D and CV:0.03 D,respectively)were found to be significantly lower than cycloplegic TTR(1.43 D,1.38 D and 0.3 D;P=0.012,P=0.011 and P=0.04,respectively)and retinoscopy(1.34 D,1.45 D and 0.23 D;P=0.04,P=0.002 and P=0.045,respectively).Mean cycloplegic SV,SEV,CV were not significantly different between Rmax and TTR,Rmax and retinoscopy,TTR and retinoscopy.Cycloplegic or noncycloplegic axis values were not different between any method.CONCLUSION:Rmax may be used successfully as a screening tool but may not be accurate enough for actual spectacle prescription.Cycloplegic Rmax measurements may be able to identify refractive error in children because of approximate results to retinoscopy.