作者:
基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
The thinking-for-speaking hypothesis, formulated by Dan Slobin, has been considered a weak version of or an alternative to linguistic relativity since the 1990 s. Both state the influence of language on thought. However, claims regarding thinking-for-speaking are based on verbal evidence, whereas linguistic relativity claims are based on nonverbal evidence. There seems to be no interface between the two. The author argues that thinking for speaking is not an alternative but complementary to linguistic relativity by opening a window into the mind through which the influence of language on cognition is seen with observable behavior, and that the new paradigm of thinking for speaking and gesturing enables a combination of verbal and co-verbal evidence for the effect of language on cognition, as illustrated here by crosslinguistic comparisons of motion event narratives based on Talmy’s linguistic typological framework.
推荐文章
基于虚拟演播室的Motion Capture研究
虚拟演播室
Motion Capture
虚拟现实
基于Leap Motion的体感遥控小车设计
遥控小车
手势识别
Leap Motion
ATK-ESP8266模块
平面定位传感器
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Thinking for Speaking and Gesturing Motion Events: A Typological Perspective
来源期刊 语言与符号学研究 学科 文学
关键词 thinking-for-speaking (TFS) HYPOTHESIS LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY MOTION EVENTS language and cognition
年,卷(期) 2018,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 84-104
页数 21页 分类号 H0-05
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2018(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
thinking-for-speaking
(TFS)
HYPOTHESIS
LINGUISTIC
RELATIVITY
MOTION
EVENTS
language
and
cognition
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
语言与符号学研究
季刊
2096-031X
32-1859/H
The School of Foreig
28-471
出版文献量(篇)
206
总下载数(次)
1
总被引数(次)
0
论文1v1指导