基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
The pharmaceutical industry has made it very difficult to know what the clinical trial evidence actually is regarding psychotropics. Consequently, primary care physicians and other front-line practitioners are at a disadvantage when attempting to adhere to the ethical and scientific mandates of evidence based prescriptive practice. This article calls for a higher standard of prescriptive care derived from a risk/benefit analysis of clinical trial evidence. The authors assert that current prescribing practices are often empirically unsound and unduly influenced by pharmaceutical company interests, resulting in unnecessary risks to patients. In the spirit of evidenced based medicine’s inclusion of patient values as well as the movement toward health home and integrated care, we present a patient bill of rights for psychotropic prescription. We then offer guidelines to raise the bar of care equal to the available science for all prescribers of psychiatric medications.
推荐文章
电力CALL CENTER系统中间件关键技术及其实现
电力
中间件
客户呼叫中心
多通道
一种改进CARE业务流估计算法
捕获-再捕获模型
业务流估计
CARE学习模式在护生护理实践学习中的应用
CARE学习模式
护理实践
护生
临床实习
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 A Patient Bill of Rights for Psychotropic Prescription: A Call for a Higher Standard of Care
来源期刊 临床医学国际期刊(英文) 学科 医学
关键词 PSYCHOTROPICS Risk/Benefit Analysis PATIENT RIGHTS Primary Care PHYSICIANS Pharmaceutical Company Influence
年,卷(期) 2011,(4) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 353-359
页数 7页 分类号 R73
字数 语种
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (0)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
2011(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
研究主题发展历程
节点文献
PSYCHOTROPICS
Risk/Benefit
Analysis
PATIENT
RIGHTS
Primary
Care
PHYSICIANS
Pharmaceutical
Company
Influence
研究起点
研究来源
研究分支
研究去脉
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
临床医学国际期刊(英文)
月刊
2158-284X
武汉市江夏区汤逊湖北路38号光谷总部空间
出版文献量(篇)
962
总下载数(次)
0
论文1v1指导