基本信息来源于合作网站,原文需代理用户跳转至来源网站获取       
摘要:
Background:The prediction of biogeographical patterns from a large number of driving factors with complex interactions, correlations and non-linear dependences require advanced analytical methods and modeling tools. This study compares different statistical and machine learning-based models for predicting fungal productivity biogeographical patterns as a case study for the thorough assessment of the performance of alternative modeling approaches to provide accurate and ecologically-consistent predictions. Methods:We evaluated and compared the performance of two statistical modeling techniques, namely, generalized linear mixed models and geographically weighted regression, and four techniques based on different machine learning algorithms, namely, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine and artificial neural network to predict fungal productivity. Model evaluation was conducted using a systematic methodology combining random, spatial and environmental blocking together with the assessment of the ecological consistency of spatially-explicit model predictions according to scientific knowledge. Results:Fungal productivity predictions were sensitive to the modeling approach and the number of predictors used. Moreover, the importance assigned to different predictors varied between machine learning modeling approaches. Decision tree-based models increased prediction accuracy by more than 10%compared to other machine learning approaches, and by more than 20%compared to statistical models, and resulted in higher ecological consistence of the predicted biogeographical patterns of fungal productivity. (Continued from previous page) Conclusions:Decision tree-based models were the best approach for prediction both in sampling-like environments as well as in extrapolation beyond the spatial and climatic range of the modeling data. In this study, we show that proper variable selection is crucial to create robust models for extrapolation in biophysically differentiated areas. This allows for reducing the dimensions of the ecosystem space described by the predictors of the models, resulting in higher similarity between the modeling data and the environmental conditions over the whole study area. When dealing with spatial-temporal data in the analysis of biogeographical patterns, environmental blocking is postulated as a highly informative technique to be used in cross-validation to assess the prediction error over larger scales.
推荐文章
Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using GIS-based statistical and machine learning mode
Landslide susceptibility mapping
Statistical model
Machine learning model
Four cases
Low net primary productivity of dominant tree species in a karst forest, southwestern China: first e
Biomass increment
Tree ring
Girth measurement
Karst evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest
Allometric functions
Forest carbon storage in Guizhou Province based on field measurement dataset
Forest carbon storage
Field measurement dataset
Karst landform
Low carbon storage of woody debris in a karst forest in southwestern China
Secondary forest
Fine woody debris
Coarse woody debris
Dead wood
Karst
Subtropical China
内容分析
关键词云
关键词热度
相关文献总数  
(/次)
(/年)
文献信息
篇名 Performance of statistical and machine learning-based methods for predicting biogeographical patterns of fungal productivity in forest ecosystems
来源期刊 森林生态系统(英文版) 学科
关键词
年,卷(期) 2021,(2) 所属期刊栏目
研究方向 页码范围 278-291
页数 14页 分类号
字数 语种 英文
DOI
五维指标
传播情况
(/次)
(/年)
引文网络
引文网络
二级参考文献  (0)
共引文献  (0)
参考文献  (61)
节点文献
引证文献  (0)
同被引文献  (0)
二级引证文献  (0)
1968(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1983(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1991(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1997(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
1999(3)
  • 参考文献(3)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2003(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2004(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2005(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2006(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2007(3)
  • 参考文献(3)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2008(2)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2009(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2010(3)
  • 参考文献(3)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2011(1)
  • 参考文献(1)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2012(2)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2013(3)
  • 参考文献(3)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2014(4)
  • 参考文献(4)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2015(7)
  • 参考文献(7)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2016(3)
  • 参考文献(3)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2017(7)
  • 参考文献(7)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2018(4)
  • 参考文献(4)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2019(8)
  • 参考文献(8)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2020(2)
  • 参考文献(2)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
2021(0)
  • 参考文献(0)
  • 二级参考文献(0)
  • 引证文献(0)
  • 二级引证文献(0)
引文网络交叉学科
相关学者/机构
期刊影响力
森林生态系统(英文版)
季刊
2095-6355
10-1166/S
大16开
北京市海淀区清华东路35号
1994
eng
出版文献量(篇)
805
总下载数(次)
0
论文1v1指导